Evaluation and analyze the different meanings of home in two patterns of apartment and Independent courtyard house. (Case study: Shiraz city)

Document Type : Scientific Research

Author

Faculty member of technical department in Yasouj university

Abstract

Research Problem: Home is not just a place to live but also the home of each person's body is his identity So that each person shows what he is or what he like to be in his home. So, the home has a meaning beyond the shelter. This place has a different meaning for different people and understanding this meaning could be laying the groundwork for creating a desirable place to live.
There is so many researches in the desirability of home space and factors which made this desirability. It seems that the home desirability is dependent to its inhabitant’s satisfaction. So, the meaning that people percept of their own living environment effect on the satisfaction or non-satisfaction of the home environment. Therefore, it seems that by understanding the different meanings that people perceive of their own home environment, can be achieved optimal mental picture of desirable house.
This study sought to examine the different meanings that different people percept from their living environment. So, two common settlement patterns in contemporary housing including apartments and independent pattern courtyard was chosen as case study and try to extract the different meaning in which its occupant perceive from them. It is obvious that the extraction of semantic differentiation in the settlement patterns can sometimes be the development of the quality of people's lives.
Research Question: In this article, the two main questions are answered as follows:
- What are the different meanings that people perceive in the home environment?
- Which of these meanings is more appealing to apartment dwellers and which to homeowners?
Research Method: In this study, thirteen meant for home is explained as the theoretical framework of the study that was extracted from the house meanings literature review, the elite and internal survey. In the next stage, the possibility of this meaning was measured for apartment and independent pattern courtyard settlements. The study population were 338 people from settlements of apartment and independent pattern courtyard who were lived in different district. The data collection tool was closed questionnaire and in-depth interviews with people. Data analyses in the quantity section was based on K-2 test and logistic regression and in the qualities, section was based on content analyses method.
The Most Important Results and Conclusion: The results showed that the change in the people life style and separation between people work place and their home, made their home as a place for relaxing from the bustle of urban life. Also, part of the meanings of houses is made by the social interactions between people and their family. So, this kind of meaning which is created due to social interaction between its occupants, is created in two kind of home in the same quantity. However, the meaning such as “Freedom”, “Belonging and rootedness”, “Difference”, “Continuity” and “Identity” are more evident in the independent pattern courtyard house. It seems that this is because of the different affordance which this type has than apartment patterns. Some of these affordances are independent courtyard, Ivan, the possibility of growing vegetation, more area level, more specific areas, a large reception hall and such these. However, in apartment style, because of affordances such as having a controllable iterance, dwelling in height, the presence of nearby neighbors and such these lead to creating Security sense for its occupants.

Graphical Abstract

Evaluation and analyze the different meanings of home in two patterns of apartment and Independent courtyard house.  
(Case study: Shiraz city)

Keywords

Main Subjects


آقالطیفی، آزاده. (1391)، انسان و خانه، تبیین الگوی تعامل انسان و خانه معاصر در ایران، پایان نامه دکتری، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
حیدری، علی اکبر. (1397). بررسی معیارهای مطلوبیت سکونتی در سه مقیاس واحد آپارتمانی، ساختمان مسکونی و محله (نمونه موردی شهر مشهد)، مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، سال 6، شماره 23: 19-30. http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-541-fa.html
حیدری، علی اکبر؛ سعدوندی، مهدی؛ دمشناس، الهام؛ دمشناس، الهه. (1397)، اولویت­بندی شاخص­های مرتبط با ترجیحات مسکونی افراد در سه مقیاس واحد مسکونی، آپارتمان و محله (نمونه موردی: مقایسه دیدگاه ساکنین سه شهر مشهد، نیشابور و تربت جام)، فصلنامه معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، شماره 25: 1-14.  (https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=490562)
حیدری، علی اکبر؛ مطلبی، قاسم؛ شهروز، بهاره. (1398)، نقش زمان در شکل­گیری سطوح مختلف معنای مکان، فصلنامه معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، شماره 27: 67-75.
فلاحت، محمد صادق، (1385)، مفهوم حس مکان و عوامل شکل دهنده آن، فصلنامه هنرهای زیبا، شماره 26: 57-66. (http://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_92449.html)
گزارش بازنگری طرح تفصیلی شهر شیراز، (1383)، کارفرما: شهرداری شیراز- معاونت شهرسازی و معماری، مشاور: مهندسان مشاور و برنامه ربزی شهر و خانه.
لینچ، کوین. (1387). "تئوری شکل شهر"، ترجمه سید حسین بحرینی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
مدیری، آتوسا. (1387). مکان، هویت شهر، دوره 2، شماره 2، 69-79. (http://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_1086.html)
Agnew, J. A. (1987). Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, J. S. (1989). The Power of Place: Bringing Together Geographical and Sociological Imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Appleyard, D. (1979). “Home”. Architectural Assoc. O. 2: 4-20.
Bachelard, G. (1970), The poetics of space, Orion Press.
Blunt, A & R. Dowling, (2006), Home, Routledge.
Canter, D. (1977a). Book review of E. Relph, `Place and placelessness'. Environment and Planning, 4, 118-120 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251484582_Place_and_Placelessness_Edward_Relph.
Canter, D. (1977b). The Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.
Chapman, T and J. Hockey. (1999). Ideal Home? Social change and domestic life. Routledge.
Cooper Marcus, C. (1974), The house as symbol of life. in: Lang, J.T. (ed) Designing for human behavior: Architecture and behavior Sciences.
Couper, M.P& Groves, R.M. (1996). Social Environment impact on survey cooperation, Quality and Quantity, 30: 173- 188.
Dourish, P and Chalmers, M. (1994), “Running out of Space: Navigating in Information Spaces”, Adjunct Proceedings (Short Papers), HCI’94, Glasgow.
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Miffl.
Groves, T; Yongmiao Hong, J.Mc, and Naughton, B. (1994). "Autonomy and Incentives in Chinese State Enterprises," Quart. J. Econ., 109:1, pp. 183-209. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118432?seq=1
Groat, L. (1995). Introduction: Place, aesthetic evaluation and home. London: Academic Press.
Gustafson, P. E. R. (2001). MEANINGS OF PLACE: EVERYDAY EXPERIENCE AND THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATIONS. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5-16.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494400901853
Hallin, P.-O. (1993). Platsens aktualitet: Svensk Geogra¢sk Ðrsbok.
Hayward, D. G. (1975). Home as an environmental and psychological concept. Landscape, 20, 2-9.  https://www.amazon.com/Home-as-environmental-psychological-concept/dp/B00072ASTO
Hayward, G. (1977). Psychological concepts of home among urban middle class families with young children. City University of New York (unpublished thesis).
Kaltenborn, B. P. (1997a). Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in Southern Norway. Leisure Sciences, 19, 175-189. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01490409709512248
Kaltenborn, B. P. (1997b). Recreation homes in natural settings: Factors a¡ecting place attachment. Norsk Geogra¢sk Tidsskrift, 51, 187-198. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00291959708542842
Lawson, B. (2001). The language of space. London: Butterworth- Heinemann.
Marcus, C. C. (1995). House as a mirror of self. Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.
Montreuil, C., Després, C., & Beauregard, L. (2011). IMPACT OF HOME MODIFICATIONS ON THE MEANING OF HOME FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. international conference on best practices in universal design.
Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context, Journal of environment psychology, (20), p.207-217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494400901786
Proshansky, Harold M., Ittelson, William H., Rivlin, Leanne G. (1970). Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Setting, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Rapaport, A. (1969). House form and culture, Prentice-Hall.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach University of Arizona Press.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Saegret, S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In: Werner, I.A.C.M. (ed) home environment, New York: Plenuim Press. P133-151. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4899-2266-3_12
Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 49-63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494486800342
Sixmith, J. (1986). THE MEANING OF HOME: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 281-298. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222074147_The_meaning_of_home_An_exploratory_study_of_environmental_experience
Somerville, P. (1997). The social construction of home, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, (14): P. 226-245. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030210?seq=1
Stedman, R.C. (2003). Sense of place and forest science: toward a program of quantitative research, Forest Science 49(6): 1-8. https://academic.oup.com/forestscience/article/49/6/822/4617227
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential Environment. In: Stokols, D. and I. Altman (eds). Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley Interscience.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. London: Edward Arnold.
Webster. (2001). Webster's encyclopedic unabridged dictionary of the English language. New York: Gramercy Books.
Zingmark, K., Norberg, A., & Sandman, P.-O. (1995). The experience of being at home throughout the life span. Investigation of persons aged from 2 to 102, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(1), 47-62. https://europepmc.org/article/med/8530193