Investigating the Impacts of technological revolutions on theoretical attitude to ornament: Industrial and digital revolution

Document Type : Scientific Research

Author

Assistant professor, Architecture, Department of Architecture, Shahryar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Shahriar, Iran

Abstract

Research Problem: In a glance at human life, it turns out that the desire for beauty is one of the human needs and is always one of his main concerns. Eventually The desire that led him to found the art. Humans have historically used different ways of creating beauty in different ways, such as using ornaments or creating different forms or combinations of both, while anthropologists say that in the early societies decoration Have been used for purposes other than the creation of beauty and have put forward different views on this. The ornament has always served as a complement to architecture and occasionally provided the opportunity for more individual creativity and has been used for many years as a tool in the service of architectural aesthetics. It has a backdrop and has played a vital role, depending on the political and social and economic conditions, such as many of the styles that are entirely related to their "Ornament" type and sometimes as in modern times in isolation. Slave and rejected. “Ornament" is an accessory or detail used to beautify the appearance of something to which it is added or of which it is a part. From the Industrial Revolution to the present day, high-profile developments in architecture have taken place which goes back an important part to the use of "ornament".What is clear up to this point is that the definition of beauty changes with the change in the intellectual structures of societies and the formation of philosophies of each epoch that is affected by the circumstances; This definition has had a direct impact on the ornamentation. Developments from the Industrial Revolution led to a new definition of beauty in which "ornament" had no place. What can be called the Industrial Revolution is the product of a series of political, social, economic, scientific and artistic developments that had taken place before. In the middle of the twentieth century, the world is facing another revolution in technology that is changing the fate of the world at a dramatic pace, a digital revolution in which analog technology is transformed into digital technology and creates a new concept of technology.The purpose of this study was to show the impact of material developments and especially technology on the formulation of theoretical attitudes on architecture "ornament ".
Research Question: The main question of the research is what attitudes to the "ornament" category in the history of architectural thinking can be identified, and what do these attitudes have in common or different?
Research Method: To answer the question, theoretical attitudes about the concept of "ornament" in the three periods before the Industrial Revolution, after the Industrial Revolution, and the Digital Revolution period were compared, and the views of the experts were compared. The research method is library studies and then logical reasoning.
The Most Important Results and Conclusion: The results of the study show that the existing attitudes can be divided into two general categories: "decorating" as part of the whole and "decorating" as a whole. "Ornament" as a part of its whole is divided into two adjoining and non-adjoining groups.

Graphical Abstract

Investigating the Impacts of technological revolutions on theoretical attitude to ornament: Industrial and digital revolution

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

احمدی، بابک. 1401. مدرنیته و اندیشه انتقادی. تهران: نشر مرکز. https://nashremarkaz.com/book/Modernity-and-critical-thought.
اسکرین، پیتر. فورست، لیلیان.1402. ناتورالیسم (طبیعت‌گرایی) ترجمه حسن افشار. تهران: نشر مرکز. https://nashremarkaz.com/book/Naturalism/%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%B3%D9%85.
بانی مسعود، امیر. 1395. پست‌مدرنیته و معماری. چاپ 5. تهران: نشر خاک. https://ketabmail.com/%D8%AE%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%BE%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%AA%D9%87%D9%88%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%AE%D8%A7%DA%A9.
بانی مسعود، امیر. ۱۳۹۲. معماری غرب: ریشه‌ها و مفاهیم. تهران: نشر هنر معماری قرن. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1949460/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B4%D9%87%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C%D9%85.
تریلینگ، جیمز.۱۳۹۴. زبان تزیین. ترجمه فهیمه زارع زاده و منصور حسامی. تهران: اداره انتشارات دانشگاه هنر. https://fekrenobook.ir/product/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%8%D8%AA%D8%B2%D8%A6%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%81%D8%AC%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%B2%D8%AA%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%86%DA%AF%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%AC.
خبازی، زوبین.۱۳۹۱. پارادایم معماری الگوریتمیک، تهران: کتابکده کسری. https://kasrapublishing.ir/?product=%D9%BE%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%85%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%84%DA%AF%D9%88%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA%D9%85%DB%8C%DA%A9.
دهخدا، علی‌اکبر.۱۳۷۲. لغت‌نامه دهخدا. تهران: مؤسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
علوی نژاد، سید محسن و دیگران. ۱۳۸۹. مطالعه تطبیقی در کاربرد دو اصطلاح تزیینات معماری و دیوارنگاری در منابع هنر اسلامی. نگره. ۵ (۱۵). تابستان. 5-17. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20130318123223-9806-23.pdf.
کانوی، دیوید و رانلد مانسون.۱۳۹۱. مبانی استدلال. ترجمه تورج قانونی. تهران: نشر ققنوس. https://qoqnoos.ir/Content/Images/uploaded/21-04.pdf.
کهون، لارنس 1396. از مدرنیسم تا پست‌مدرنیسم. چاپ 12. تهران: نشر نی. https://www.iranketab.ir/book/25280-from-modernism-to-postmodernism-an-anthology
گاردنر، هلن.۱۳۸۵. هنر درگذر زمان. ترجمه محمدتقی فرامرزی. چاپ ۷. تهران: موسسه انتشارات آگاه. پاییز. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1480008/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D9%87%D9%86%D8%B1-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%B1-%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86.
گروت، لیندا، دیوید وانگ.۱۳۹۶. روش‌های تحقیق در معماری. ترجمه علیرضا عینی فر. چاپ 9. تهران: نشر دانشگاه تهران. https://www.novinbook.net/image/cache/catalog/Book/tehran/ACDSee_Scan_Thu-Aug-06_15-55-37_resize_new-400x300.jpg.
گروتر، یورگ کورت.۱۳۸۹. زیبایی‌شناسی در معماری. ترجمه جهانشاه پاکزاد. تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. https://library.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_lib&view=docinfo&type=1&DocID=114186&lang=fa.
گیدیون، زیگفرید.۱۳۸۸. فضا، زمان، معماری. ترجمه منوچهر مزینی. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی. https://fidibo.com/book/112975-%D9%81%D8%B6%D8%A7-%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C.
محمدی فومنی، حسین.۱۳۸۹. مدرنیته و یکسان­سازی فرهنگی. روزنامه رسالت. ش ۷۰۰۴. ص ۱۸. بهار. https://www.magiran.com/article/2102663.
مددپور، محمد.1388.  سیر تفکر معاصر؛ جلد اول. تهران: نشر سوره مهر. https://sooremehr.ir/book/1029/%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D9%81%DA%A9%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B5%D8%B1.
مددپور، محمد.1392. فلسفه های پست مدرن غربی و گریز و گذر از مدرنیته. تهران: انتشارات سوره مهر. https://sooremehr.ir/book/2128/%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D9%87%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%BE%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%BA%D8%B1%D8%A8%DB%8C%D9%88%DA%AF%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%B2%D9%88%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B.
مزینی، منوچهر.۱۳۸۴. از زمان و معماری. تهران: مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری ایران. https://library.art.ac.ir/dL/search/default.aspx?Term=17078&Field=0&DTC=405.
موسوی، فرشید. کوبو، مایکل. ۱۳۹۳. کاربرد تزیینات در معماری قرن ۲۰. ترجمه: مهرداد جاویدنژاد و هرمز داورپناه.چاپ 2. تهران: علم و معمار. https://fekrenobook.ir/product/%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%AA%D8%B2%D8%A6%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%DBC-%D9%82%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA.
Alberti, Leon BattistaThe. 1975. Ten Books on Architecture. ed. leoni. New York: Dover Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Ten-Books-Architecture-1755-Leoni/dp/0486252396
Brolin, C.B. 2000. Architectural Ornament Punishment and Return. New York: W.W.Norton and.co.
Dietterlin. Wendel. 2006. Architecture of Division Symmetry and Proportion of the Five Columns 1598 From Architectural Theory from The Renaissance to The Present.ed. Taschen. Thierry Nebois. Pp. 520-529. https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.1607#0001
Gibbs, James. 2013. Book of Architecture: an eighteenth century classic. ed. Unabridged . New York: Dover Publications. https://www.everand.com/book/271529381/Gibbs-Book-of-Architecture-An-Eighteenth-Century-Classic
Guest,Clare Lapraik. 2016. The Understanding of Ornament in the Italian Renaissance. Ed. Lam.  Leiden:Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/31922?language=en.
Heideloff, Carl Alexander. 1844. Collection of Architectural Ornaments of the Middle-Ages, London: Hering and Remington. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/351502
Mallgrave,H. 2005. Modern Architectural Theory: A Historical Survey, 1968–1673 Cambridge: University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Modern_Architectural_Theory.html?id=iK7ld8-oYswC
Moussavi, Farshid and Michael Kubo. 2006. The Function of Ornament. Barcelona: Actar. https://www.arch.chula.ac.th/journal/files/article/6AoGJYFOK2Thu92524.pdf
Nouri, Maryam. Azizi, Shadi. 2019. Comparative study of the use of metaphor as a literary technique in the special architecture of the nineteenth and twentieth century. CLRJ.  7 (4). pp1-29. URL: http://clrj.modares.ac.ir/article-12-30059-fa.html
Pugin, Augustus Welby. 2005. Pugin's Ecclesiastical Ornament.  Dover Publications.
Pugin, Augustus Welby. 2005. Pugin's Ecclesias, (Dover Pictorial Archives) Paperback – Bargain Price. August 10. https://www.amazon.in/Pugins Ecclesiastical Ornament-Pictorial-Archives/dp/0486440028
Ruskin, John. 1849. The seven Lamps of Architecture. Library ED Volume VIII. NEW YORK: LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/ruskin/8SevenLampsofArchitecture.pdf.
Ruskin, John.1880. The Stones of Venice Collins. Wiley New York: Wiley. https://biblioteca.org.ar/libros/167702.pdf.
Sales Meyer, Franz. 1920. Handbook of Ornament. New York: Architectural Book Pub. Co. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Handbook_of_ornament__a_grammar_of_art%2C_industrial_and_architectural_designing_in_all_its_branches%2C_for_practical_as_well_as_theoretical_use_%28IA_handbookoforname00meye_1%29.pdf.
Saglam, Hakan. 2014. Re-thinking the Concept of “Ornament ” in Architectural Design. jurnal of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 122. 19 March, Pp 126-133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814013317.
Semper, Gottfried.1989. The Four elements of Architecture and Other Writings Mallgrave,H.F. Bermann, W. Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/ElementsArchitecture-Monographs-Anthropology-Aesthetics/dp/0521180864
Taschen ed. Nebois, Thierry. 2006. Architectural Theory from The Renaissance to The Present.
venturi,Robert and other. 1977. Learning From Las Vegas.Cambridge:The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://monoskop.org/images/archive/c/cd/20170506121429%21Venturi_Brown_Izenour_Learning_from_Las_Vegas_rev_ed_missing_pp_164-192.pdf
Viollet-Le-Duc, Eugene Emmanuel.1877. from “Discourses on Architecture”, trans. Henry van Brunt. Boston: James R. Osgood and Co. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1424998
Vitruvius, Marcus.1914. the Ten Books on Architecture, Trans. by Morris Hicky Morgan. cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://www.chenarch.com/images/arch-texts/0000-Vitruvius-50BC-Ten-Books-of-Architecture.pdf
Picon, Antoine. 2013. Ornament: The Politics of Architecture and Subjectivity. Harvard University. https://www.gsd.harvard.edu/publication/ornament-the-politics-of-architecture-and-subjectivity
Journal of Architectural Thought
Volume 7, Issue 14 - Serial Number 14
October 2023
Pages 152-168

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics