نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه معماری، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری اسلامی، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران
چکیده
چکیده تصویری
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Architecture reflects the ideas and values in every culture. Therefore, the architecture of a society can be a mirror of the entire cultural paradigm of that society. Unfortunately, what we see in contemporary architecture is neglecting the organization and body of buildings. The experience of the variety of different spaces implies environmental characteristics that are affected by the form, activities, performance and provision of human needs. The identity of the cities is derived from the culture of their people, cultural factors such as the religious beliefs of the people have caused the development and regulation of the structure of the cities. One of these important buildings, religious buildings, including the buildings of Holy Tombs, is of particular importance due to its internal connection with the culture, manners and social rituals of the common people. The architectural jewel of the Islamic era, especially during the Safavid period, when this city was declared as the capital and after the officialization of the Shia religion, it was the patron of many Sadats and Alawites, who chose this city as their safe place and finally in this city They rushed to visit God.
Bekaa Mutbarakah is one of the public buildings in the land of Iran, which is important from various social, artistic, religious and historical aspects, and in terms of importance for the religious society of Iran, after mosques, it ranks second among religious buildings. and you can find hardly any place in Iran that is empty of this type of building. Physical diversity and the way of organizing the space are two factors of personality in different types of architecture. Examining the changes in the two mentioned indicators can be a way to understand and shape the body of architecture. As a result, the comparison of architectural methods in different periods can be found to be effective in measuring these two indicators. This issue is important in cities with historical context. One of these cities with ancient context in Iran is Isfahan. By studying in this context, this research is looking for an answer to the questions raised. These questions are:
What are the factors affecting body formation? The diversity of architecture during the Seljuq, Ilkhani, Timurid and Safavid periods in Isfahan city represents the change in what components? The aim of the research is to identify the factors influencing the diversity in the holy land of Isfahan city, which is done by comparative comparison between the four historical periods of Seljuk, Ilkhanate, Timurid and Safavid periods. This research, with analytical-historical method and case study, has compared the components of diversity in Bekaa Mutbarkeh city of Isfahan in the four historical periods mentioned. The sample community includes six mausoleums: Imamzadeh Ismail, Imamzadeh Jafar, Shahshahan Mausoleum, Shahzaid Imamzadeh, Babarkin-al-Din Mausoleum, and Uncle Abdullah Mausoleum. The results show that the comparative and analytical comparison of the components of diversity in the remains of Seljuq, Ilkhani, Timurid and Safavid periods in Isfahan city shows that the physical diversity in the remains of these four periods is different from each other and the similarities in The use of geometric patterns is in two categories: Seljuq and Timurid periods, in contrast to Ilkhani and Safavid periods.
کلیدواژهها [English]